Skip to content

JoIE Blog

The official blog of the Journal of Institutional Economics

Menu
  • Home
  • Latest Posts
  • Editor-in-chief page
  • About this journal
    • Aims
    • Citation Impact
    • Notes for Contributors
    • Complaints and Appeals Procedures
    • Editors
    • International Advisory Board
    • Journal Issues
    • Elinor Ostrom Prize
    • Supplementary Material
    • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Contact
Menu

Article summary: “Adapting as usual: integrative and segregative institutions shaping adaptation to climate change in local public administrations”

Posted on September 15, 2017 by Nikhilesh Sinha

Summary of JOIE article “Adapting as usual: integrative and segregative institutions shaping adaptation to climate change in local public administrations”, by Matteo Roggero (Resource Economics Group, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany) and Andreas Thiel (International Agricultural Policy and Environmental Governance, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany). The full article is available on the JOIE website.

Although research on adaptation to climate change hasn’t yet achieved a consensus on the matter, many adaptation strategies and National Adaptation Plans entrust local administrations with a central role in delivering adaptation to climate change. Doing so is a task of great complexity, though, requiring the different branches and offices within a local administration to act in a coordinated fashion.

Starting from this premise, the article sets out to explore the link between the way administrations coordinate action in general and the way they do it in the frame of climate change adaptation. It raises the question, in other words, whether the complexity of the adaptation task is reflected in the organizational response to it, and, specifically, whether the prior availability of coordination structures determines the type of institutional change ensuing.

From an institutional perspective, the analysis is based on transaction costs economics, exploring the role of integrative and segregative institutions in the way local administrations adapt. Specifically, the paper conceptualizes the conditions under which different functional branches of a local administration respond to climate change collectively rather than independently.

Such conditions are given, the paper argues, by the trade-off between two typologies of costs: the costs of segregation and the costs of integration. The former correspond, in essence, to the costs incurring to decision-makers for neglecting the interests of other stakeholders. The latter represent instead the effort of engaging in intensive social relations with other stakeholders in order to take their interests into account.

As integration costs increase, segregation costs decrease. Actors minimizing transaction costs would be expected to settle for those institutional arrangements where the sum of integration and segregation costs is minimal. Yet, local conditions may lead such least-cost arrangements to differ across different contexts, giving rise to different status quo institutions. Climate change may then alter such local conditions, potentially triggering diverging responses.

Such conceptual expectations are explored empirically through a comparative analysis of 19 climate-sensitive local administrations in Germany. Case studies were compiled on the basis of interviews with administration officials, subsequently coded, and analyzed through set-theoretic methods. The analysis confirms that variation in the way local administrations structure their internal coordination determines the way they approach climate adaptation.

The evidence collected shows that under prior integrative institutions local administrations adjust available coordination structures to accommodate adaptation. They thus experience a process of incremental institutional change. Under segregative institutions, administrations move towards integrative institutions, thus experiencing actual institutional change. They do so, however, provided they already ‘feel’ climate change.

The paper’s findings have implications for the way we think local administrations go about adaptation. While confirming the reactive nature of local adaptation action, the paper shows that administrations differ qualitatively, and that they do so in systematic ways that have a bearing on how they structure the adaptation process. Regional and national decision-makers may want to take this into account while crafting instruments to support local administrations in the task of delivering climate adaptation.

Matteo Roggero (Resource Economics Group, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany) and Andreas Thiel (International Agricultural Policy and Environmental Governance, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany)

 

Share this…

  • Google


  • Email


  • Facebook


  • Whatsapp



  • Twitter


  • Linkedin


  • Print

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Links

Cambridge University Press

Journal of Institutional Economics homepage

WINIR

Search the site

Find posts by keywords

Africa Article summary bibliometrics common-pool resource Comparative Development Competition convergence COVID-19 Cultural dimensions Culture Democracy discrimination Economic freedom Economic institutions Economics Structure Elinor Ostrom Prize Entreprensurship environmental institutions Financial Institutions formal institutions game theory Historical Political Economy Hofstede Informal Constraints informal institutions informal rules institutional economics institutions money Ostrom Political institutions polycentric governance Polycentricity property rights public goods rule of law Rule of Law Index Symposium on Corporations taxation transaction costs trust Uncategorized United States USSR Violence

Categories

  • Article Summary (66)
  • Blog Editor Post (4)
  • Uncategorized (2)

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • February 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • July 2024
  • April 2024
  • December 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • February 2023
  • September 2022
  • June 2022
  • March 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • October 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • Corruption and informal practices in the Middle East and North Africa: a pooled cross-sectional analysis
  • Jaurès’s The New Army (1911): the organisation of democratic institutions as war prevention
  • Bringing emotions into post-Northian institutional economics: a reading inspired by John Dewey
  • Understanding Masahiko Aoki’s comparative institutional analysis
  • Heterogeneous effects of economic freedom on human capital in developing countries
RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.
RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.
RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.
RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.
©2025 JoIE Blog | Built using WordPress and Responsive Blogily theme by Superb